MINISTER EDNA MOLEWA, LEADS IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT OF RHINOCEROS IN
The South African Government will implement integrated strategic
management of rhinoceros in South
Africa .
On 6 August 2014, Cabinet deliberated on discussing the 2013 rhino
population census undertaken in the Kruger
National Park and decided on
integrated strategic interventions for the management of rhinoceros in South Africa .
The rhino population in South Africa rescued from the brink
of extinction in the early 1900s. At the time, the rhino population in the Kruger National
Park was locally extinct. Since the start of the
relocation of 351 rhino from the Hluhluwe-uMfolozi game reserve in KwaZulu-Natal to the
Kruger National Park 50 years ago, the Kruger rhino population had increased to
between 8 700 and 12 200 in 2010.
Translocation of 1 450 rhino from the Kruger National Park
between 1997 and 2013 has contributed significantly to the growth of the South
African rhino population. South Africa
is home to 82% of Africa’s rhino, 93% of Africa’s white rhino and 39% of Africa ’s black rhino. The reason that white rhino exist
is because of this country’s exemplary conservation record.
As of 2012, South
Africa ’s rhino population was estimated at
21 000.
SANParks conducts periodic population surveys. During the latest
survey in 2013, conducted by SANParks, the rhino population survey showed that
between 8 400 and 9 600 white rhinos are presently living in Kruger National Park .
It is clear from regular surveys that rhinos found in different
densities across Kruger
National Park . Poaching
pressure is also uneven across the Park’s landscape. Some areas are relatively
free of recorded poaching incidents while poachers hard hit others.
Poaching, natural deaths and the translocation of rhino from the Kruger National
Park presently match that of rhino births. This
means that the rhino population in the Kruger National Park
has stabilised.
We recognise that poaching is part of a multi-billion dollar
worldwide illicit wildlife trade. Addressing the scourge is not simple. That is
why we will continue to strengthen holistic and integrated interventions and
explore new innovative options to ensure the long-term survival of the species.
It is in this context that Cabinet has decided that we implement
these more vigorous integrated strategic management approach aimed at reducing
the threat to rhinos and the biological management of the species. This
includes strategic translocation, as we have always done.
The integrated
interventions adopted by Cabinet are:
· Compulsory
interventions;
· The increase in rhino numbers;
· International and national collaboration and
cooperation; and
· Long-term sustainability measures.
Compulsory
interventions include pro-active anti-poaching initiatives, the implementation
and improvement of actionable intelligence as well as the introduction of
responsive legislation and policy amendments to address rhino poaching. Other
interventions include continued efforts to increase rhino numbers through, for
example, translocation to low risk areas, range- and population expansion.
New interventions include
steps to disrupt crime syndicates. Our Security Cluster will implement these.
Long-term
sustainable solutions, to ensure the future survival of this key species,
include the creation of economic alternatives for communities taking into
account the government’s sustainable utilisation policy.
Interventions
on international collaboration will further strengthen efforts to address not only rhino poaching, but illegal wildlife trade in
general. It’s international acknowledged that illegal wildlife trade results in
devastating impacts on species, ecosystems, sustainable livelihoods, economies,
and national and regional security.
Collaboration between range, transit and consumer States is
therefore essential to address this challenge effectively. Several MOUs have
already concluded by the Department of Environmental Affairs. There is,
however, a need to accelerate co-operation with key identified countries.
The government has realized that the work that we are doing
requires continued adaptability to meet changing dynamics.
Actions associated with this
include:
· Strengthening
and persisting with pro-active anti-poaching operations
· Continuous joint operations with key
neighbouring countries
· Improved intelligence gathering and analysis
capability; and
· Improving general protection in the other
parks and provincial reserves where rhino are present, with the help of
relevant technology
The protection of rhinos inside parks with intensive protection
zones, and technology interventions, complimented with extensive emphasis on
national, regional and international collaboration between law enforcement
agencies and the criminal justice system. Greater attention given collates
proactive intelligence from multi-agencies – nationally and ideally regionally
and internationally.
In the Kruger
National Park and other
parks, these interventions aimed at reducing the threat to rhinos through
numerous strategies. These include the creation of an Intensive Protection Zone
(IPZ) in the Kruger
National Park . Here,
several technologically advanced methods explored to help anti-poaching teams
to intensively reinforce the protection of rhinos.
In other parts of the Kruger
National Park , and in
national parks and protected areas nationwide, cooperative and complementary
traditional anti-poaching activities help curb poaching. Among the actions
taken, has been the introduction of forensic technology, including DNA
analysis, in the judicial process to support the successful prosecution of
alleged wildlife criminals.
The number of alleged rhino poachers arrested since the beginning
of 2014 has increased considerably compared to 2013. During the 2013/14 financial year, 70
cases were finalised against 140 accused nationwide, with a conviction rate of
61%.
The most successful prosecution to date has been that of Mandla
Chauke who handed an effective sentence of 77-years
in prison by the Nelspruit
Regional Court .
The biological management of rhino is the key focus of the
Integrated Strategic Management approach. This includes ecological management
of rhino habitat, such as water distribution and fire regimes, that are
fundamental to the ecological management of protected areas.
An additional action is the translocation of rhino from areas
where rhinos are threatened (e.g. eastern boundary of Kruger National Park ),
as well as areas where environmental conditions and high rhino densities
restrict breeding and increase mortalities.
Our previous experience has shown that biological management,
which includes translocations, has resulted in the growth of rhino numbers in South Africa .
The complimentary approach of strategic relocations from the Kruger National Park
and the creation of rhino strongholds will allow the total rhino population
size of South Africa
to continue to grow.
Translocated rhinos contribute to the creation of alternative
strongholds, which are areas where rhinos cost-effectively protected while
applying conservation husbandry to maximize population growth.
This approach allows the offsetting of poaching in the short to
medium term, while also expanding rhino range and improving overall population
size.
There are several secondary
benefits of establishing more rhino strongholds, including:
· the
expansion of conservation-friendly land uses;
· improved capacity and infrastructure within
protected areas, especially where these were hampered through historical
constraints on conservation resources; and
· To implement South
Africa ’s sustainable use policies
Another key priority is the creation of an enabling environment
that fosters alternative economic choices for communities. Communities who are
located next to protected areas bear the brunt of exploitation from where crime
syndicates recruit potential poachers.
Providing alternative incentives will encourage the recognition of
all the values of rhino. In short, the aim is to make a live rhino more
valuable to communities than a dead rhino.
Entering into Memoranda of Understanding with range states is key.
The MoU with Mozambique
recognises the need of strengthening community development on the Mozambican
side as a key intervention.
Cabinet authorised the Department of Environmental Affairs in July
2013 to explore the feasibility of possible trade in rhino horn, or not. There
is no final decision on this matter as Cabinet has established an
Inter-Ministerial Committee and a Panel of Experts to consider all
possibilities.
Stakeholders
are invited to register to participate in the process of the Panel of Experts.
The long
term sustainable solutions are linked to the creation of alternative economic
opportunities for communities bordering protected areas; creating incentives to
promote / facilitate rhino ownership; and the consolidation of rhino population
across different land-uses in South
Africa including national, provincial,
private and communal land.
We anticipate that challenges will not remain static – thereby
necessitating an adaptable rhino management response that changes in response
to these challenges.
No comments:
Post a Comment