AGANGSA vows for free and fair election
By BRIAN KAJENGO
AGANGSA says the three alleged Independent electoral commission
have to with draw from the system.
“It is imperative in the interests of a free and fair
election that is above reproach, that Adv Pansy Tlakula, Norman du
Plessis and Stephen Langtry, the three Independent Electoral Commission
officials implicated in tender irregularities by an
independent forensic investigation conducted by Price
Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) that followed an earlier report from the Office of the
Public Protector, stand down from their positions until after the election.” Paul
O’Sullivan said.
Paul O’Sullivan says the PWC investigation found that
Tlakula had acted improperly to secure office space for the IEC, that the
process was not transparent, with hidden beneficiaries to the deal costing the
tax-payer R110 in wasted expenditure, that the office space secured
was 50% larger than required, no doubt to fill the building owned by
hidden benefactors and was rented at well above market rates.
In addition, the investigation found that African National
Congress members registered as co-directors with Adv Tlakula of a
company which has a stake in the business from which the office space leased.
“With the Public Protector’s findings on Nkandla out of the
way for now, we believe the eyes of the nation should be fixed on events at the
IEC which have the potential to cast a shadow over the elections on the 7th May,
so we can demand appropriate steps to ensure our elections and
democracy remain protected,” says Agang SA spokesman on corruption and
forensic consultant, Paul O’Sullivan.
The 2014 election expected to be the most closely contested
since 1994. For the first time, the governing ANC is under severe pressure and
is increasingly desperate to hold on to power.
For instance, the ANC’s traditional election machinery is
stalling, with the African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL) and the
Congress of South Africa Trade Unions (COSATU) mere shadows of their former
selves, the decision of the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa
(NUMSA) to withdraw electoral support from the ANC and begin the process of
starting up a new party, and widespread discontent with President Zuma within
the ANC.
The scale of protests – 3 000 in the past three months
– and the barring of entry to ANC officials in a growing number of communities,
is widely regarded as a sign of the mounting unhappiness among the electorate
which could result in some ANC officials, as has allegedly occurred in Tlokwe,
to take steps towards election fraud.
“Against this background, it is critical that the IEC
remains above reproach. It simply cannot do that with Adv Tlakula, du
Plessis and Langtry still in their positions,” says O’Sullivan. "The whole
nation has come to expect the highest levels of integrity and ethics from the
executive of the IEC, in order to maintain the dream that Mandela and so many like
him, made their sacrifices. That level of integrity and ethics has now
evaporated, placing the oversight of the elections at risk, and calling the
whole organisation into doubt. We simply owe Madiba a duty to see that his
vision for our country maintained. He suffered for a better country and we just
owe him that duty." he said.
In addition, Agang SA party leader Dr Mamphela Ramphele has
insisted that teachers, who in the past been deployed to manage polling
stations and who are members of the South African Democratic Trade Union
(SADTU), which is a COSATU affiliate organization and therefore part of the
governing alliance, be removed from this role.
“There is an inherent conflict of interest in SADTU members
operating as electoral officers in a multi-party election process. This
is magnified when we have an IEC who's executive are engaged in secret business
deals with ANC members, resulting in what can best be described as a fraud ont
he nation. In addition, when do they do their primary duties if they play the
electoral officer role that demands so much attention to detail?” asks
Ramphele.
“Along with other parties, we intend raising these and other
matters, that are concerning us with the IEC when we meet in the next few
weeks,” says Ramphele.
Among the questions parties will put to the IEC are: who has
won the tender to print ballot papers and the basis for their selection; which
auditing firm will oversee the count ballots and on what basis was
the audit firm chosen; whether the ballots have serial numbers; what security
exists to ensure non-tampering with ballots; under what circumstances are extra
ballots printed, stored, and distributed to voting stations?
The IEC should also spell out, says Ramphele, how it intends
to protect the election against potential voter fraud, particularly in
far-flung rural areas.
“Political Parties need to have sufficient time to engage
with the IEC to ensure the required checks and balances are in place, so we are
anxiously waiting for the meeting with the IEC,” says Ramphele.
“It is going to be crucial to these elections that we
motivate for and get national scrutiny of this election
from suitably independent and international election
monitors who can monitor behaviour such as the use of cell phones by political
party activists to intimidate or bribe voters into taking photos of their
completed ballot paper in exchange for rewards for voting the right way.” says
O’Sullivan. "Rumours of this intended vote-buying have become more
prevalent and it has to be stamped out immediately, with anyone seen
photographing their vote having same declared invalid," he concluded.
At
stake, says Ramphele, is the integrity of the election which forms the bedrock
of South Africa’s
emerging democracy that struggle heroes fought and died for.